📌 THE FACTS (What Actually Happened)
After the civil war ended in 1970, General Yakubu Gowon promised a return to civilian rule. He set a target of 1976. Then he delayed. And delayed. And delayed.
By 1974, Gowon announced that the transition was “not realistic” and that Nigeria would remain under military rule indefinitely. The public grew restless. The economy, boosted by the 1973 oil boom, was generating massive revenues—but corruption was rampant, and the military elite was enriching itself.
On 29 July 1975, Gowon was overthrown in a bloodless coup while attending an OAU summit in Kampala, Uganda. His successor, General Murtala Mohammed, promised a swift return to civilian rule. He created a transition program with a clear timeline: civilian government by 1979.
Murtala Mohammed was assassinated on 13 February 1976 in a failed coup attempt led by Lieutenant Colonel Buka Suka Dimka. His deputy, General Olusegun Obasanjo, took power and continued the transition program.
THE 1979 CONSTITUTION
In 1979, Nigeria adopted its first post-war civilian constitution. It was modelled on the American presidential system, with significant adaptations for Nigeria’s unique challenges.
Key Features:
– Executive Presidency – A directly elected president with executive powers, serving a maximum of two four-year terms. – Bicameral Legislature – A Senate (5 senators per state) and a House of Representatives (based on population). – Independent Judiciary – Courts at federal and state levels, with a Supreme Court as the highest judicial body. – Federal Character Principle – Appointments to government positions must reflect the ethnic and regional diversity of Nigeria. No single ethnic group should dominate. – Bill of Rights – Fundamental human rights guaranteed, including freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. – 19 States – The old three regions were replaced by 19 states, designed to weaken regional power blocs. The Logic: The Federal Character Principle was Nigeria’s answer to the problem that caused the civil war: regional domination. If every ethnic group had a seat at the table, the thinking went, no group would feel so marginalised that they would take up arms.
The Election (1979):
Shehu Shagari, a northerner from the National Party of Nigeria (NPN), was declared the winner. His main opponent, Obafemi Awolowo, a Yoruba from the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), contested the results. The Supreme Court upheld Shagari’s victory.
Nigeria had a civilian president for the first time in 13 years.
WHY IT LOOKED LIKE PROGRESS
For a moment, it worked. -Democracy returned. For the first time since 1966, Nigerians voted for their leaders. – The military stepped back. Generals returned to barracks. Civilian rule was the new norm. – Oil money flowed. The 1970s oil boom had filled the treasury. There was money to spend. – The Federal Character Principle promised inclusion. Every region, every ethnic group, was represented.It was supposed to be the new beginning. The break from the past.But the rot was already inside.
WHY IT FAILED
- Corruption Became the SystemShagari’s government was accused of widespread embezzlement. Oil revenue—billions of dollars—disappeared into private accounts. Government contracts were awarded to political allies. Civil servants were paid but rarely worked. The phrase “Nigerian factor” entered the lexicon—a euphemism for dysfunction.
2. The 1983 Election Was RiggedThe 1983 elections were marred by violence, ballot-box stuffing, and intimidation. The opposition NPN (Shagari’s party) was declared the winner in a landslide—but the result was widely disputed. Awolowo’s UPN and other opposition parties cried foul.In the South, electoral fraud was blatant. In the North, Shagari’s victory was assured by a massive, unverified voter turnout. The country was already divided before the results were announced.
3. Economic CollapseThe oil boom of the 1970s ended abruptly. Global oil prices crashed. Nigeria’s economy—almost entirely dependent on oil—collapsed. Inflation soared. Infrastructure crumbled. The government was bankrupt.
4. Ethnic Tensions ResurfacedThe Federal Character Principle, designed to build unity, became a tool of patronage. Appointments were made not for competence, but for ethnic balance. A ministry was given to a northerner because the last one was a southerner—not because the northerner was qualified.Merit died. Competence was secondary. The system rewarded connection, not capability.
5. The Coup of 1983On 31 December 1983, the military struck again. General Muhammadu Buhari overthrew Shagari. The constitution was suspended. Civilian rule had lasted only four years.
Shagari’s government was not overthrown because it was incompetent. It was overthrown because it was corrupt. And corruption—not military ambition—was the disease that killed the 1979 Constitution.
THE VERDICT
The 1979 Constitution was not a failure because of its design. It was a failure because of the people who executed it.The
Federal Character Principle was a noble experiment. It could have built a genuinely inclusive nation. Instead, it became a meal ticket for political elites. Appointments were made not for merit, but for ethnicity. Every northerner got a ministry. Every southerner got one too. But competence was never the priority.
The constitution guaranteed fundamental rights—but those rights were never enforced. Journalists were jailed. Opponents were harassed. The rule of law was a fiction.
And when the military returned in 1983, Nigerians did not weep. They sighed. And they said: “We tried. It didn’t work.”
But the truth is harder: they didn’t try hard enough. The civilian leaders of 1979 inherited a military regime’s problems—but they also inherited a military regime’s habits. They ruled like generals, not democrats. They treated the treasury as personal property. They treated the constitution as a suggestion.
The 1979 Constitution promised a break from the past. Instead, it repeated the past—with better handwriting.
🔁 WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN (If Nigeria Had Chosen Differently)
Imagine that after the 1979 elections, Shagari had:
– Appointed ministers based on competence, not ethnicity. – Prosecuted corrupt officials publicly, regardless of their region or political affiliation. – Invested oil revenue in infrastructure, education, and healthcare—not private accounts. – Held free and fair elections in 1983—and accepted the result if he lost.
Imagine that the 1983 election had been transparent. Imagine the opposition had won. Imagine Nigeria had experienced its first peaceful transfer of power.
What would have happened?
– Civilian rule would have endured. – The military would have stayed in barracks. – Nigeria would have learned that democracy works—if you let it work. – The 1990s would have been a decade of growth, not military coups, human rights abuses, and further economic collapse.
The Human Difference
Today, a young Nigerian would not have to ask: “When will we get it right?”
Instead, they would ask: “How can we make it better?”
That is the difference between a country that survives and a country that thrives.
📌 THE LESSON FOR TODAY
Nigeria’s problem was never the constitution. It was the people who governed under it.
The 1979 Constitution was not the culprit. It was the scapegoat. The real issue was a political class that saw power as an opportunity for enrichment, not service. The military used corruption as a reason to intervene—but they were corrupt too.
The 1979 Constitution failed because there was no accountability. No one was punished for electoral fraud. No one was prosecuted for embezzlement. No one was held to account for destroying the country’s future.
A constitution without enforcement is just a piece of paper.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. Was the 1979 Constitution a failure of design or a failure of execution?
2. Can a country heal its divisions without holding its leaders accountable?
3. What would Nigeria look like today if democracy had survived in 1983?
Leave a Reply