Subtitle: From 3 Regions to 36 Beggars
🔥 TRENDING TOPIC HOOK:
Nigeria has 36 states – more than the United States has for a landmass smaller than Alaska. But most of our states cannot pay salaries without federal handouts. How did “federalism” become a begging system?
📜 HISTORICAL FACTS
THE GOWON GAMBIT (1967)
During the Civil War, General Yakubu Gowon issued Decree No. 14 on May 27, 1967. He abolished the three regions and created 12 states.
– The North was divided into 6 states.- The East was divided into 3 states (one of which was the South‑Eastern State, meant to weaken Biafra).
– The West was divided into 2 states, with Lagos carved out as a federal territory.
The stated reason: to break the power of the regions and bring government closer to the people.
The real reason: to destroy the political and economic power of the East and West. Smaller states would be weaker and more dependent on the federal center.
THE PROLIFERATION
Every subsequent military ruler created more states:| Year | Leader | Number of States ||——|——–|——————|| 1967 | Gowon | 3 → 12 || 1976 | Murtala Muhammed | 12 → 19 || 1987 | Babangida | 19 → 21 || 1991 | Babangida | 21 → 30 || 1996 | Abacha | 30 → 36 (+ FCT) |
THE RESULT – A “FEEDING BOTTLE” FEDERATION
With 36 states and one federal capital, Nigeria has more states than the United States (which has 50 but with vastly larger land and population). The problem: most Nigerian states are not economically viable.As of 2024:
– Over 20 states could not pay the minimum wage without federal allocation.
– The federal government collects over 80% of national revenue and distributes it based on a formula that rewards population (which is inflated) and land mass, not productivity.
– Many states spend 70–90% of their budgets on salaries and overhead. There is nothing left for development.
THE VERDICT:
The state‑creation project did not bring the government closer to the people. It brought the people closer to the federal trough. Nigeria is not a federation of states. It is a unitary system with 36 administrative districts called “states” for decoration.
🔁 WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN (If We Did It Right)
THE COUNTERFACTUAL:
Imagine that instead of creating 36 dependent states, Nigeria had done the opposite:
– Retained the 3 or 4 regions as powerful, autonomous economic zones.
– Allowed regions to create their own internal administrative units (provinces, counties) as they wished, without federal interference.
– Constitutional requirement: No new state could be created unless it could demonstrate it could fund at least 50% of its budget from internally generated revenue.
– Revenue allocation formula: 50% derivation (state keeps what it produces), 30% equal access (to help poorer states), 20% population (honestly counted).
WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED?
– No “beggar states.” Only economically viable states would exist. States would compete to attract investment and grow their tax base.
– Real federalism. The center would handle only defense, currency, foreign affairs, and interstate disputes. Everything else – education, health, police, infrastructure – would be handled at the state or regional level.
– No state‑creation for political patronage. Presidents would not create states to reward cronies or balance ethnic equations.
– Stronger local government. Regions would design their own local systems, which would be more responsive than the current uniform, corrupt, and powerless local government system.
HOW NIGERIANS WOULD BE BETTER OFF TODAY:
| Metric | Actual Nigeria (2026) | Counterfactual (Viable States) ||——–|———————-|——————————–|| Number of states | 36 (many non‑viable) | 6–12 (all viable) || Federal share of revenue | ~80% | ~30% || State IGR as % of total | ~20% | ~70% || Governor’s power | High (over allocation) | High (over production) || Corruption incentive | Steal federal allocation | Grow local economy |
THE HUMAN DIFFERENCE:
– Your state government would not be waiting for the 15th of each month to pay salaries.
– It would be building factories, fixing roads, and competing with the next state to lower taxes and attract your business.
– If your state were poor, you would know the reason – and you would vote to change leadership or merge with a richer neighbor.
– You would be a citizen, not a client.
Leave a Reply